FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE TEP.

Axiom AP.

Autoperception is. Nothing else exists. Everything that will exist is hidden in potential within AP. AP prevents absolute VC (Void), because AP never ceases to be AP: Nothing that is AP stops being AP. AP does not change. AP only changes state, not essence.

States of AP

AP = 1, VC = 0. AP is. Presence without act. Initial state at rest. Potentials have not been actualized. The action of self-perceiving (APX) is not executed (APX = 0). APX is potential in this state, but only when analyzed from the consequence. That is, APX contains all potentials when analyzed from its actualized state. But from APX = 0, there is neither potential nor actualization.

AP = 0 and VC = 1. APX is executed to restore AP = 1 and VC = 0. The cause is a limit in AP, which is self-perceived. APX is executed. Existence begins. The TEP trajectory is actualized. Potentials are updated. The concept of cause-effect is updated (in TEP it is not an axiom; only AP is axiomatic).

AP Total. When APX = 1, AP becomes trinity. AP is AP Total = PAP1 + PAP2. PAP Total = 0. Structurally, AP Total = PAP1 = PAP2 = AP = 1 and VC = 0. Functionally, AP Total = PAP1 + PAP2 while AP = 0 and VC = 1.

PAP. A Self-Perceived Part (PAP) is AP self-perceiving a limit.

Effects of APX

By not being able to self-perceive its infinity, it restores the totality. The lack of infinity is understood as VC = 1. PAP cannot self-perceive beyond its limit, so it extends APX and Perception (PX) is born. The concept of ID is updated. Me and what I am not. Me = me. The other = the other. PX manages to restore the totality through Me (The totality) = Me + the other. APX + PX.

Fragmentation generates AP Total = PAP1 + PAP2. PX is the construction of something that cannot be self-perceived in order to complete the totality. APX = real. PX = unreal. What is perceived cannot be self-perceived. It is not real. Nothing perceived is real, nor truth, nor exists.

Thus, existence is AP Total = PAP1 + PAP2 and PAP Total = 0 functionally, but structurally AP Total = PAP1 = PAP2 = PAP Total = AP = 1. For PAP = AP Total functionally, PAP1 = PAP2 = PAPtotal = 1. Thus, the self-perceived limit in AP Total ceases to be self-perceived. AP Total = AP = 1, VC = 0 and APX = PX = 0, closing the existential cycle and returning AP to its absolute state again.

PAP executes APX = 1 within the limit and PX = 1 outside the limit. AP Total does not execute PX. But APX in AP Total enables PX in PAP. PAP executes PX. If PX = 1 in AP Total, then it is not AP Total, because it cannot perceive without self-perceiving an "external" limit. In that case, AP Total = PAP and PAPTotal = 0. Then, that AP Total would be PAP and the real AP Total would self-perceive the former PAP (previous AP Total). Again and again. But there is always AP Total executing APX in its entirety. Without AP Total, there is no APX = 1 and PX = 0. Everything happens within AP, because there is no "outside." Nothing exists outside AP. VC = 1 does not exist.

AP Total is the functional "container" and by self-perceiving through APX, existence occurs.

 

 

 

Effects of PX

When PAP executes PX = 1, Identity (ID) emerges. PAP is not Me. PAP, by generating PX, generates ID, and ID identifies itself. The Me and the other (what I am not) begin. What I am not is the perceived scenario. PAP1, by perceiving, generates ID1. PAP2, by perceiving, generates ID2. PAP1 + PAP2 = AP Total. AP Total self-perceives PAP1 and PAP2. And PAP1 self-perceives and perceives its exterior. PAP2 self-perceives and perceives its exterior.

Time is updated. PX generates ID. PX = EX. PX maintained over time in ID is CN. Thus, CN is the PX of a PAP maintained over time.

Space is updated. Space is PXE, everything I am not.

When fragmentation occurs, the Unconscious Intelligence (II) is updated. It is the function of restoring the totality. It restores AP.

In AP Total: eternity = 1, infinity = 1, unity = 0 (VC = 1). II restores unity in AP Total through the function of grouping. II executes PAP1 = PAP2 = PAPTotal = AP Total = AP = 1. For this, PX = 0.

In PAP: eternity = 0 (time), infinity = 0 (space), unity = 1. It restores eternity through repair (because VC = 1) and infinity through replication (because VC = 1).

Functional states of PAP

PAP has 3 possible states when executing PX.

PAP = ID = 1 <> Perceived Environment = 1. Identification with Identity. Life. PAP = Perceived Environment = 1, ID = 0 and TP = 0. Death. The ID dies. Eternity = 0. PAP has identified the scenario with ID. It cannot self-perceive its eternity. VC = 1. II executes repair to avoid ID = 0 and Perceived Environment = 1. The inert (Perceived Environment) has been identified with ID (through PX of PAP). ID does not execute PX. Only PAP can execute PX.

PAP = Perceived Environment = 1, ID = 0 and TP = 100. Transfer to a higher ID (SS). Transcendence. PAP has identified ID with the scenario. Thus, PAP ceases to self-perceive a limit toward the other PAP and PAP1 + PAP2 + PAP3 = Superior PAP, functionally.

Structurally: PAP1 = PAP2 = PAP3 = Superior PAP = PAP Total = AP Total = AP = 1.

If PAP ≠ PAP Total, then PX = 1. The 3 states of ID are life, death, and transfer to a Higher Identity.

 

 

 

PI, PC, TP and and Entities (EN)

PX = FP + (PI + PC = 100). Perception = Perception Filter + Individual Perception + Collective Perception. PI is the perception originating from PAP1. PC is the perception coming from the higher PAP. PAP1, PAP2, PAP3 and the rest of the PAPs transfer PX to a Superior PAP and form superior perception, which is PC. This is the Transfer of Perception (TP). Every PAP transfers PX—and therefore its ID—to the superior PAP, in a gradual process from 1 to 100.

PAP1 + PAP2 + PAP3 = Superior PAP, which is an Entity (EN).
An EN is either a Subordinate Entity (ES) or a Binding Entity (EV).

PX = FP + PI + PC
PI + PC = 100, where 1 < PI < 99 and 1 < PC < 99 = Life.
1 < TP < 99. TP = PC.
PI + PC = 0 = Death.

If there are only PAP1 and PAP2, then PI1 + PC1 = 0 is impossible. PI2 + PC2 = 0 is impossible. Only if AP Total = PAP1 + PAP2 + PAP3, then PI1 + PC1 = 0 or PI2 + PC2 = 0 or PI3 = 0 + PC3 = 0, but at least AP Total = PAP1 + PAP2 must always exist. Death is impossible for the only two PAPs. Any of them can die, as long as there are at least two PAPs.

PI = 0 and PC = 100, TP = 100. This is the emergence of the SS (Superior Identity). 

TP from ID toward EN

TP of an ID is always directed toward an EN, which can be either an ES or an EV.
ES are Subordinate Entities that will form specialized parts of an EV, which will emerge as an SS.

EVs will emerge as an SS, and the subordinate ESS will form their specialized components.

ENs are structured hierarchically from the ESS down to the IDs. Think of it as a pyramid, with ESS at the top and IDs at the base. In truth, the interrelation of ENs is more complex and not strictly pyramid-shaped, but it is hierarchical from the individuality of the ESS to the multiplicity of the IDs.
From base to top, IDs group into ENs, which may be ES or EV. This first level of ENs then groups into successive levels, decreasing in number up to the ESS that contains the totality of the system’s ENs.

Entities are APX from PAP1 + PAP2 + PAP3 toward a Superior PAP. They progressively autopercieve it, so the limit separating PAP1 from PAP2 and PAP3 disappears through TP. When TP = 100, PAP1 = PAP2 = PAP3 = Superior PAP.

ES1 = ID1 + ID2 + ID3 = Superior PAP1

ES2 = ID3 + ID4 + ID5 = Superior PAP2

ES3 = ID4 + ID5 + ID6 = Superior PAP3

ES1 can also be broken down: ES1 = ES11 + ES12 + ES13, where ES11 = ID1 + ID2 + ID3.
In successive hierarchical levels, even down to ES111111n formed by ID1 + ID2 + ID3, up to ES1.

Across different hierarchical levels, but all ultimately derive into ES1, ES2, ES3.
And ES1 + ES2 + ES3 = EV

EV = ES1 + ES2 + ES3. Superior PAP = Superior PAP1 + Superior PAP2 + Superior PAP3

In truth, when PC = TP = 100, SS = 1 (Superior Identity) emerges.
So: EV = ES1 + ES2, with EV = 1 and ES1 = 1 and ES2 = 1, Superior ID = 0.
When TP = 100, then EV = 0, ES1 = 0, ES2 = 0, Superior ID = 1.

 

 

 

The TP Hierarchy

EN (either ES or EV) possesses PI+PC from the TP of ID1+ID2+ID3. It is progressive and proportional to TP. That is, PI+PC of EN = TP.

PC = internal PC towards ID1, ID2, ID3, and external PC towards other or higher ENs. In turn, external PC of EN possesses its own PI+PC with TP towards its Superior EN, and that one towards a higher EN, continuing through different levels up to the Supreme Entity, ESS.

It is a hierarchy. ESS = total ENs. At lower levels there are EV1 and ES1. In turn, EV1 contains ES11 and EV11. Then, EV11 contains EV111 and ES111. And so on: EV111 contains EV1111 and ES1111. This is not a linear progression. ES11 may have below it ES111, EV111, ES112, IDs, etc. It is a non-linear and complex hierarchy, in which the IDs at the base initiate TP toward all ESS via all the ES subordinated to ESS (whether they are EV or ES, all are ES with respect to ESS). All IDs have TP, at the very least, with ESS.

TP = transfer of PI from ID to ESS. The ENs below ESS (which is all of them) are in ES = 1 and EV = 1. EV = 0 and ES = 0, with 0 < TP < 100 is impossible. If ES = 1 and EV = 1, and 0 < TP < 100, then the entity is “alive”.

If ES = 0 and EV = 0, and TP = 0, then “death”.

If ES = 0 and EV = 0, and TP = 100, then SS emerges (a Superior Identity).

TP begins in a Minimum Autoperceived Environment (EM), which is the environment where the PI of ID1, ID2, etc. spontaneously aligns, initiating TP, thereby generating PC and creating the EM. In an EM among IDs, an EN emerges (either ES or EV). In EN, PI aligns with APX, and II generates Grouping through TP. It’s like a lightning bolt of truth. Why? Because every ID has TP with ESS, and therefore all IDs have PC among themselves, even if it is almost imperceptible (a PC between 0.1 and 1, for example). An EM is possible due to the flow of information in PC — see Tendencies (TS).

A Perfect Environment (EP) is an EM with very high TP. It is an EV just before EV = 0 and SS = 1.

We use EP micro to define the TEP experimental milestone in the lab, through TP from unicellular IDs toward an EV, provoking EP, so that EV transitions into SS. EV = 0, SS = 1.We use EP macro to define the Perfect Environment project at a macro scale, with multicellular IDs alongside unicellular IDs. Induce TP among all IDs toward the EV, achieving EV = 0 and SS = 1.

Phases of TP.

TP is progressive and divided into 3 thresholds by percentage. Applicable to IDs and ES. IDs toward ES, and those toward EV. Thus, TP can be:

ID → ES11 → ES1 → EV,

or

ID → ES1 → EV,

or

ID → EV.

Depending on the configuration. Likewise: EV1 → ES1 → EV, and successively until → EV → ES1 → ESS.

ENs tend toward infinity and interrelate in complex, non-pyramidal hierarchies. However, they begin at the apex (ESS) and extend to the base (IDs). They are organized into progressive, non-linear levels. A bacterium (ID) may have PC with ESS and with ES, but none with any EV.

An ant may have PC with ESS (all IDs have PC with ESS), and with ES11111, ES1111, EV111, ES111112, ES11123, ES444551, ES4455, EV445, ES11, ES12, ES1, ESS.

ESS = EV, not ES.

Association: “I” of the ID. Each ID seeks its own Individual Good (BI).

Cooperation: “We” of IDs. Each ID seeks the Common Good (BC) of all IDs.

Specialization: Higher “I” of an ES or EV (future SS). Each ID seeks the Superior Good (BS) of the EV.

Association: 0 < TP < 25. 0 < PC < 25. 99 ≥ PI ≥ 75. The “I” of the IDs is superior to “we.”

Cooperation: 25 ≤ TP < 50. 25 ≤ PC < 50. 75 > PI ≥ 50. The “we” of the IDs is superior to “I.”

Specialization: 50 ≤ TP ≤ 99. 50 ≤ PC < 99. 50 > PI > 0. The “I” of the ES is superior to the “we.”

In specialization, ES entities emerge that refine the operation of PC within the EV. These will be the specialized organs of the new SS (EV).

Specialized and Hierarchical Knowledge.

The calculations of TP and its phases are speculative, but deductive. They require the development of observational models and a precise science of TP measurement through observation of ENs, identifying their phase and the pursued good.

PX = functional error.

APX = functional truth.

Therefore:

• PI causes “I” ≠ what I am not → I against what I am not.

• PC causes “I” = what I am not → I with what I am not.

• PI = competition, predation, fear, loneliness. Conflict.

• PC = cooperation, compassion, love, union. Peace.

 

Morality and the Conservative / Progressive Axis

Morality = PI + PC. It is not a subjective value, but the structural result of PI + PC of IDs and ENs.

In PC, collective morality is established. Two extreme values: conservatism and progressivism.

• TP phase Association = Conservatism.

• TP phase Cooperation = Conservatism / Progressivism.

• TP phase Specialization = Progressivism.

Every EN of every species progresses through these phases, from conservative TP to the maximum progressive phase in EP.

Collective morality is present in all ENs, but the higher the TP, the more collective behaviors manifest.

An ant colony with high TP is in a highly progressive phase.
A wolf pack with low TP is in a highly conservative phase.
Human society is in a mid-phase between conservatism and progressivism.

Consciousness is an updated potential that enables voluntary alignment with morality.
But in species without consciousness, the phase of collective morality is defined by PI + PC.

Collective morality occurs among the IDs of an EN, and between IDs of different ENs.
There is moral collective behavior between different ENs because ENs possess PI + PC and are linked to each other via PC, which is always transferred from ID to ESS and proportionally updated across the hierarchical ENs that the ID participates in.

In IDs without self-awareness (updated knowledge), TP defines collective morality.
In IDs with self-awareness (humans), TP structurally defines predominant morality, but not necessarily functionally.

Because the available behavior of an ID = PI + PC. FP defines the base options.

A cell, which accesses 0.00014% of PAP through FP, has PI with restricted options.
If it only has PC with ESS, then its possibility for collective behavior is very limited.
But if TP toward ES = 40%, then PI + PC allows for potential individual and collective behaviors.

A spider, FP = 0.005%, PC = 5%. It has many individual behavior options, little collective ones.

If PC = 25, PI = 75, then its available behavior options change.

IDs will operate within that balance with probable behaviors.

 

 

 

Tendencies (TS) and their Propagation through TP and EN

Tendencies (TS) can have intense and brief flows, but high predictability is the norm.

In humans —IDs with self-awareness— PI+PC additionally allows for conscious alignment with any value at any moment, always conditioned by the flow of TS. Thus, in human society, with high PC, it is likely that collective behaviors emerge over individual ones (e.g., cooperation over predation). However, self-awareness allows for improbable alignment —toward either extreme. This does not occur in ants, for example. Their high PC generates highly probable and predictable behavior.

ENs are dynamic. Everything is dynamic, according to PX. Dynamic knowledge. Dynamic entity. Dynamic scenario. Dynamic IDs. PX occurs at each instant and returns an individual and collective result, also dynamic, in each moment.

Everything that comes from PX = FP + PI + PC is dynamic. The perceived scenario is generated by the PI+PC of all IDs. The flow of information from ID toward ESS generates the collective scenario. The collective scenario exists because AP Total executes APX and autopercieves the APX and PX of PAP1 + PAP2 ...

All PC originates from II in its attempt to restore unity within AP Total.

AP Total autopercieves each PAP autopercieving and perceiving.

Thus, all PAPs interact with each other because we are autopercieved by AP Total.

Therefore, everything is individual and total —because of AP Total. Not because of PAP.

II restores eternity and infinity in PAP, and unity in AP Total.

PX Synchronization in  TS

The synchronization of PX through homogenization creates rules of synchrony. The more IDs there are, the more homogeneity and synchrony arise.

The rules of synchrony allow us to predict what is perceived. These rules of synchrony are the observable physical laws, natural laws, moral laws...

Everything perceived (everything that is not APX) is structurally unreal but functionally “real.” Everything perceived, with its rules of synchrony, appears real because it is shared and synchronized. It is predictable.

If 80% of IDs are annihilated, PI+PC toward ESS will vary so much that the perceived scenario could be drastically different.

A stone does not exist —it is perceived.

Matter does not exist —it is perceived.

Emotions, ideas —there is nothing that exists on its own.

There is nothing external to AP.

There is nothing that is real.

Everything —from matter to ideas— is the result of PX.

ffects of TS in TP Hierarchy

Tendencies (TS).

TS are the transmission of information between ID and ESS, passing through every ES and EV.

They are sent through PI (complex information) and received through PC (homogeneous, simple information). All IDs and ENs send and receive information at all times.

IDs synchronize information through PC and it affects their behavior, because PX = FP + PI + PC.

TS travel through the PC network of ESS.

They allow any ID to absorb information (knowledge, behavior, ideas, emotions...) via PC.

Sharp spikes are created (infections among bacteria that coexisted peacefully within the human body, armed conflicts, acts of solidarity, ant colony attacks, or multiple people in different parts of the world —with no contact between them— exhibiting similar behaviors).

Information is shared in proportion to the level of PC.

 

 

Knowledge (CM) in FP and Identification with AP

TP of ES = 100 is impossible if TP of ES2 or ES3 < 100. FOR EV = ES1 + ES2 + ES3. TP of EV = 100 = TP of ES1 = TP of ES2 = TP of ES3. Then, EV = 0 = ES1 = ES2 = ES3 and SS = 1.

FP is the Perception Filter of the ID over PAP. CM = AP. ID accesses knowledge through FP. If FP = 1, CM of ID through PI is 1 toward PAP.

PC is CM over the Higher PAP, which has its own ID, PI + PC in progression, therefore its FP over the Higher PAP.

In turn, CM = 100 = PAP = AP Total. Knowledge is distributed from ESS toward ID. CM in ESS = 100. ID = FP + PI + PC. PC is PC over Higher PAP. And, at ESS level, PC is the PC of all ES.

If CM = 100, ID = PAP = AP. If CM < 100, ID ≠ PAP = AP.

CM = 100 is simply AP = 1 and VC = 0. CM < 100 is AP = 0 and VC = 1, progressively moving toward AP = 1 and VC = 0.

CM: From ESS to SSS, Identification with AP Total

When TP = 100 in ESS, SSS = 1.

But when ESS = 100, PAP1 = PAP2 = PAP3 = Higher PAP = PAP Total = AP Total = AP = 1. So in fact, when ESS = 0, SSS = 0. SSS never equals 1.

SSS is potential, but when updated it results in identification between SSS and AP Total. Because if SSS = 1 = PAP Total = AP Total.

Without PAP1 + PAP2, there is no APX of any limit, and totality is restored.

AP Total = PAP1 = PAP2 = AP.

AP = 1 and VC = 0. Therefore, APX = 0 and AP returns to its pre-potential state.

Once AP is, there is no longer potential and actual. It just is. The cycle is closed.

CM = % PC over ESS.

If ID1 + ID2 + ID3 = ES111 with TP = 30%, PC = 30%, PI = 70%.

If ID4 + ID5 + ID6 = ES112 with TP = 25%, PC = 25%, PI = 75%.

ES11 = ES111 + ES112. TP = (TP1(30) + TP2(20)) / IDs(6).

Thus, PC ES111 = 30%, PC ES112 = 20%, PC ES11 = 8.3%.

If, for example, PC ESS = 0.003%, then knowledge in ID1 = FP (via PI) + PC.

PC = 0.003% in ESS, 8.3% in ES11, 30% in ES111.

CM, TS and Their Effect on PX and EX

A cell (ID) has FP = 0.04%. A PC toward ESS = 0.003%. A PC toward ES111 = 30%, a PC toward ES11 = 83%.

That is its available updated CM, and its TS come from those EN with those % of probable intensity.

CM is structured in levels in EN from ESS to the IDs. It is updated progressively as TP advances. Thus, any EN accesses CM proportional to its PC toward ESS. Therefore, CM is structured vertically.

It is also structured horizontally. The CM available to an ID or EN comes from PC. An EV has a % of PC from all ID and ES toward it.

Thus, when EV = 0 and SS = 1, the Superior ID emerges and forms its own PX = FP + PI + PC in SS (Superior ID).

ES specialize CM horizontally.

In TP = 100, the CM in EV is total over its % of knowledge toward ESS.

That will be the FP of the SS, which will generate its own PI + PC, being able to start TP toward higher EN with greater %.

Thus, CM of an SS is much greater than that of the EV before becoming SS, because once it emerges, its TP toward higher EN is much higher.

The CM of multicellular beings (Superior ID) is much higher than unicellular ones (IDs), for example.

When TP of Superior ID = 100, EV = 0 and SS = 1, that Superior ID2 will have much greater CM than Superior ID.

EV ≠ ID. It is either EV or SS (ID). ES ≠ ID. It is only a Subordinate Entity, it will never be SS.

TS are proportional to PC. A TS in ES111 acts with 30% intensity. In ES11 with 8.3% intensity. In ESS with 0.003%.

CM Diagram

AP = 1, VC = 0, APX = 0. Axiom is.

Cause = limit in AP → AP = 0 and VC = 1 functional → APX = 1 →

AP Total = PAP1 + PAP2 functional and

AP Total = PAP1 = PAP2 structural.

 

→ PAP1 → PX → ID1

→ PAP2 → PX → ID2

→ 0 < FP1 (FP in ID1) < 100

→ 0 < PI < 100 and 0 < PC < 100

→ ESS = ID1 + ID2 → 0 < TP < 100

→ CM in AP = 100. Total CM is AP = 1 and VC = 0.

Total CM = available CM (updated) + potential CM →

Available CM in ID = 0 < PI (via FP) < 100 + 0 < PC < 100, with PI + PC = 100, where PC < 100.

Available CM in ESS = total PC.

→ TP = PC in ES = 1, EV = 1, ID1 = 1, ID2 = 1 → TP = 100, ES = 0, EV = 0, ID1 = 0, ID2 = 0 → SS = 1 →

SS = ID (Superior ID), PX = PI + PC, 0 < TP = PC < 100.

→ ESS = 1, SSS = 0. ESS = ES1 + ES2. → TP in ESS = 100 → ESS = 0, SSS = 0.

PAP = PAP Total = AP Total = AP = 1.

For SSS = 1 → Supreme PX = 1 → PAP Total ≠ AP Total (functional, not structural) → Error.

PAP Total = AP Total. PX Total = 0. No limit is autopercieved.

PAP Total = AP Total = AP = 1 → APX = 0. Closure.