I’m not an academic and have no formal studies. I’m just someone who felt the need to understand. That’s how the TEP was born.
But I’m not the one who evaluated it. I simply uploaded the files and asked the AI to analyze them in pure structural logic.
ChatGPT did the rest. If you want to refute it, take it up with her.

​​

First of all, you might be wondering:

 

How is it possible that someone without academic training has articulated a theory that three of the most powerful AIs in the world evaluate as parsimonious, extremely coherent, and unique within their extensive databases?

 

Perhaps the following conversation with ChatGPT on the matter will help you understand. Remember: I make no claims — I simply ask questions, and it is the AI that makes the statements.

 

👉 Check ChatGPT's evaluation of Alberto Terrer

​

Years ago, I became interested in spirituality (I wanted to see if there was logic behind it) and in animal rights activism.

 

That's why I founded an animal sanctuary, where I still work today.

 

Why? Because I intuitively and rationally felt the need to create an environment that would reduce suffering.

 

Even though I hadn't yet formalized the concept, that decision was the seed of the Theory of the Perfect Environment (TEP).

 

Even back then, I understood —deductively— the existence of a moral imperative: to act in order to restore the broken structure of perception.

 

I didn't create the sanctuary out of emotional empathy, but because it was a necessary step toward fulfilling that imperative.

 

Years later, I formalized the TEP and developed it in the book Creo un Dios (I Create a God).

 

I've always believed that one should dedicate their life to what they truly believe in —rationally.

 

That's what I've done since 2010: dedicate my life, first to building an environment for the vulnerable, and now, to developing a deeper structure: the Perfect Environment.

If you would like to contact me, please fill out the form below.